Avasilmi MTÜ » Greenpeace http://www.avasilmi.eu Agitaator Sat, 22 May 2010 08:17:25 +0000 en hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3 Globaalsete brandide rohelisusest http://www.avasilmi.eu/2009/06/25/globaalsete-brandide-rohelisusest/ http://www.avasilmi.eu/2009/06/25/globaalsete-brandide-rohelisusest/#comments Thu, 25 Jun 2009 12:07:43 +0000 Martin Mägi http://uptimistid.eu/?p=108 Greenpeace avaldas globaalsete brandide rohelisuse loetelu. Nokia omanikel on põhjust rahulolev olla, kuid ärge unustage, et allpool olevatel firmadel nagu Microsoft, Dell, HP jne omavad väga tugevat heategevust ja mitte ainult looduskaitse- ja ökoloogiasektorisse. Seega seal allpool olevaid firmasid ei saa automaatselt halbadeks või keskkonnavaenulikeks  pidada.

Skoor 10 on parim, 0n halvim. Joonist ja pilti vaata originaalartiklist:  http://www.greenpeace.org/international/campaigns/toxics/electronics/how-the-companies-line-up

7.5

Nokia – Keeps top spot with new CO2 emissions reduction targets. More

6.9

Samsung – Up two places with clear support for global climate change cuts. More

5.7

Sony Ericsson – Down one place with more work to do on recycling. More

5.7

 Philips – Biggest mover, up 11 places due to big recycling policy improvements. More

5.5

 Sony – Up two places with better product energy efficiency reporting. More

5.5

 LG Electronics – Loses points for delaying toxics phase out for all products. More

5.3

 Toshiba- Loses points for poor CO2 reduction target and missing energy efficiency data. More

5.3

 Motorola – Down one place, needs to improve on waste and energy. More

4.9

Sharp – Unchanged – gains point for new US recycling scheme, loses one for weaker commitment on global emissions reduction. More

4.7

 Apple – Up four places, good on chemicals elimination, improved on recycling but still poor on energy. More

4.5

Acer – Score drops slightly due to poor e-waste scores. More

4.3

Panasonic – Down 3 places due to poor definition of precautionary principle and energy efficiency reporting. More

3.7

Dell – Continues to drop, penalty point for breaking commitment phase out of toxics by end 2009. More

3.1

 Lenovo – Penalty point for breaking commitment phase out of toxics by end 2009. More

2.7

 Microsoft – Score drops due to bad performance on e-waste. More

2.7

 HP – Penalty point for breaking commitment phase out of toxics by end 2009. More

0.8

 Nintendo – Remains in last place, unchanged score. More

Kuidas need kriteeriumid paika pandi?

  • Kuidas firmad kõrvaldavad oma toodetest ohtlikud ainud
  • Kuidas firma oma tooted tagasi võtab ja taaskäitleb, kui need iganevad.
  • Kuidas vähendatakse oma tegevuse ja toodete mõju kliimale.
]]> http://www.avasilmi.eu/2009/06/25/globaalsete-brandide-rohelisusest/feed/ 1